00:00–00:04
Frame cadence and motion remain internally consistent.
For you / Content checks
Before you believewhat you’re watching.
A convincing clip can be edited, reposted out of context, or generated. Start with its source.
See how it worksVideo Authenticity
In plain English.
Video review looks at the sequence of frames, sound, edits, and available history. An edit is a clue to investigate—not proof that an event never happened.
A situation
worth a second look.
A short social video makes a surprising claim, but the original upload is nowhere to be found.
Defeated / content checkGuided example
shared-clip.mp4
See what a useful answer looks like.
Did the clip lose its context?
A signal, the reason behind it, and a practical next step. This guided example uses fixed sample findings, not a live detection model.
A clearer next step.
Find the original, compare the full sequence, and check the claim against independent sources.
Inspect your own contentFor technical teams: explore the method
Illustrative product views and fixed sample findings. Advanced analysis requires approved services and suitable reference data.
00:00
00:04
00:08
00:12
FRAME CONTINUITYTwo transition regions merit examiner review; origin remains unestablished.
A discontinuity or recompression signal does not, by itself, establish deception, authorship, or intent.
How the review works
1Fix sequence
Retain the original container and track map.
2Segment
Index frames, motion, cuts, and audio continuity.
3Compare
Test suspicious regions against ordinary processing alternatives.
4Review
Give the examiner decisive regions—not a fake/real label.