Skip to content
DEFEATED

The Camera as a Witness

Why source-camera attribution can answer a different—and often more useful—question than synthetic-media detection.

The article pairs the argument with a correlation view and a direct route to the PRNU lab.

Detection and attribution are different

A synthetic-media detector estimates whether patterns resemble a class of generated content. Source-camera attribution compares a questioned image with known images from a specific physical sensor.

A stronger question can be narrower

The same-camera hypothesis does not settle authenticity, but it can corroborate an acquisition story or reveal that the asserted source remains unsupported.

Limits are part of the result

Reference quality, image content, resizing, compression, crop geometry, and threshold selection all shape reliability and must remain visible.

PRODUCT VIEW / GUIDED DATA

Attribution tests a concrete source hypothesis that synthetic detection cannot answer.

Question

A bounded source hypothesis can be tested against references.

Explore further

PRNU Attribution

The camera leaves a fingerprint

Source Registry

Known sources create stronger answers

Research

Turn methods into accountable systems